| |
Re-Imagining The Great American
Road Bike
A Reader's Opinion
Published in (Motorcycle) Cruiser Magazine, August 2009. Note - I would
like to thank Cruiser magazine as well as Polaris' Victory Motorcycles for
the use of their photographs in this motorcycle comparison and critique.
As any motorcycle made for travel, packing for the long haul is a necessity, and
of course that goes for touring cruisers as well. With that in mind, there are
certain choices in touring cruiser design that I have come to question somewhat
over time. One such choice is the use of what is known as a "stacked exhaust"
system, where both exhaust pipes are positioned vertically on the right side of
the bike. In the recent Motorcycle Cruiser article entitled The Great American
Road Bike - Big Bang with Bags Theory, this configuration is used on three of
the six motorcycles tested. If you're an aficionado of cruiser styling, you know
that this exhaust setup is common and not limited to full-sized cruisers. It is
also used for many of the newer class of "mid-sized" touring cruisers (as well
as cruisers not designed for travel) so observations here would apply to these
bikes as well.
First, from the article, photographs of the three bikes that use this exhaust
configuration - they are the Honda VTX1800T, the Suzuki Boulevard C109RT, and
the Victory Kingpin Tour.
/Re-Imagining%20the%20Great%20American%20Road%20Bike/01%20Honda%20VTX%201800%20-%20Cruiser.jpg) /Re-Imagining%20the%20Great%20American%20Road%20Bike/02%20Suzuki%20Boulevard%20-%20Cruiser.jpg) /Re-Imagining%20the%20Great%20American%20Road%20Bike/03%20Victory%20Kingpin%20-%20Cruiser.jpg)
First, publicity photos of motorcycles designed this way almost invariably show
the right side of the motorcycle. Why? Because this side is more visually
appealing than the side without the exhaust. Again this is opinion here, but a
photograph of the left side of the motorcycle, while still attractive, is less
so, and the overall affect when both sides of the bike are compared is something
of a visually "unbalanced" look. In photos featuring the left side of these
bikes, you may notice as I do that the saddlebag looks somewhat "abbreviated" -
that is, it is sized vertically shorter than the amount of room available for
it. Of course, its size is dictated by the size of the bag on the exhaust side,
which is shortened to fit above the stacked exhaust.
But what else does this engineering and style choice impact? Well, in the case
of a bike designed for long distance travel, it impacts several important areas
of the job that the motorcycle is designed to do. The first is to provide the
necessary storage space for long-distance travel.
Using a bit of Photoshop magic, I have altered a public release photo of the
Victory Kingpin Tour motorcycle to illustrate a few points. The first the
Victory's as currently produced, and the second is altered to show how it might appear with a common
two-into-one exhaust used by several other bikes in the comparison.
/Re-Imagining%20the%20Great%20American%20Road%20Bike/04%20KingpinTour.JPG)
The Victory Kingpin Tour
as currently manufactured.
/Re-Imagining%20the%20Great%20American%20Road%20Bike/05%20Kingpin%202-into-1.jpg)
The Kingpin Tour with two-into-one exhaust, allowing larger saddlebags.
While some might say that this change in styling is not as "flashy" as the
stacked exhaust, you can immediately see how a relatively minor change in
exhaust configuration would allow an increase in the size of both saddlebags by
nearly 50%. This would probably translate into somewhere near 33% overall
increase in storage capacity (including the trunk), while eliminating the
"abbreviated" look of the bag on the left side. The larger bags would also allow
packed weight to be carried lower on the bike, bringing down the overall center
of gravity, which would likely aid in slow speed stability. While those would
all be pretty solid reasons for the change, what else might it accomplish? Well,
just of the top of my head, I'd say it would allow for a slight upward
relocation of the exhaust system, helping to increase cornering clearance and
lean angle, one of the common complaints of almost all cruiser-styled
motorcycles.
/Re-Imagining%20the%20Great%20American%20Road%20Bike/05%20Yamaha%20Star%20Stratoliner%20-%20Cruiser.jpg)
The two-into-one exhaust used on the Star Stratoliner allows for a larger bag
on the left side of the motorcycle, which visually "balances" the left and right
sides of the bike, and increases storage room as well.
Taking it a
step further, a company could also change the exhaust configuration to put one
pipe on each side of the bike. For this rendering, I reversed the right side
image and added the drive section from a Victory Vision, so while the
mechanicals will not be 100% accurate, I think you'll see my point.
/Re-Imagining%20the%20Great%20American%20Road%20Bike/05%20Kingpin%20-%202%20Pipes%20Right%20Side.jpg)
/Re-Imagining%20the%20Great%20American%20Road%20Bike/06%20Kingpin%20-%202%20Pipes%20Left%20Side.jpg)
Besides the already increased saddlebag size, making this change would also
create a look that is more "visually balanced" on both sides of the motorcycle,
keeping the look of the bike essentially the same coming or going. Using two
pipes would also eliminate the need for any engine tuning changes (to
accommodate any change to muffler size, performance mapping for two into one
exhaust, etc.), and upward repositioning of the exhaust pipes would again be
possible here, again allowing better cornering clearance.
Finally, how about this idea? In the review, the Victory was the only motorcycle
available with a trunk-passenger backrest. Mention was made of the convenience
of being able to move the trunk-backrest forward and back 1.5 inches to
accommodate passenger comfort. Well, what if you're traveling without a
passenger? It's a very nice backrest. Why shouldn't the rider get some benefit
from it? How about making it adjustable by 1.5 feet.
/Re-Imagining%20the%20Great%20American%20Road%20Bike/07%20Kingpin%20-%20Movable%20Backrest.jpg)
While the backrest cushion might have to be repositioned downward for it to be
more usable for either rider or passenger, you get the idea. Putting the trunk
on rails and allowing it to move it forward or back as needed would accommodate
any rider and passenger size. It might even be designed so that it can be
removed from the bike completely for more of a "standard bagger" look, should the owner not
need the extra packing room. Just a guess, but I would imagine that with the
trunk in its full forward position, a larger air envelope would be created
around the rider, for a quieter ride with less buffeting.
While everyone has their own opinion on style choices and the modifications
shown here might not appeal to everyone, most would probably agree that these
changes would increase the functionality and purpose that the bike was designed
to do. Most full-dressed touring models, including Victory's Vision, Harley's
Road King and Glide series, and Honda's Goldwing already use one exhaust pipe on
each side of the bike, and those bikes all gain the benefit of increased
saddlebag capacity because of it.
As a guy with an engineering background, I have always been a big fan of the
"form following function" idea. I think it would be a good day for motorcycling
in general when manufacturers not only take a bike's style into account, but
also incorporate design ideas that increase the usability of features and
amenities for their prospective buyers. It is my guess that they would increase
the number of prospective buyers in their dealerships because of it.
Article Copyright (c) 2009, Philip A. Buonpastore, Reprint by permission.
|